PAB wrote:Contrary of what you think, I really understand Dean's point, no need to put more analogies or explain them in great details.
No you don't, and your continued remarks still FURTHER prove you have no idea of I was trying to say, nor that once again you understand the value of a $1.
PAB wrote:Though, you really got me wrong. What make you think student Arai is better than student Scorpion if you did not test them. The way they are dressed (the price they are sold)? To me it is just plain nothing.
You keep talking about a single aspect of the helmet determining it's final price. I'm saying if you go BEYOND the DOT / Snell rating there are OTHER factors that contribute to a final price. Get it now? Remember my Corvette / Cavalier analogy?
PAB wrote:Now, if I see comparative tests with a nice protocol PROVING Arai/Shoie is safer, I will reconsider my position.
Here you go again, focusing right back on ONLY the safety rating.
PAB wrote:Now, everyone is free to buy what suite himself, I just expose my reasoning.
And your reasoning is WRONG. You reason that since there are NO tests that prove a Shoei/Arai or SAFER than any other helmet; that their higher price is not warranted because they rate the same in tests.
Why did you buy your Scorpion helmet for $140.00 when there are other helmets on the market both Snell and DOT approved that are cheaper. I could argue that your Scorpion is not worth the $140.00 bucks because el-cheapo helmet at $70.00 has Snell/DOT approval, hence $140.00 is not warranted.
NOW do you see the error in your OWN purchase? You WASTED $70.00 because you could have gotten the el-cheapo helmet for $70.00 less.
Now I'm sure you are a smart man and have personal preferences and TASTES. You probably looked at the El-Cheapo helmets and then looked at the Scorpions and decided upon the Scorpion for OTHER aspects besides the Snell/DOT rating. If you come back and say the OTHER aspects besides Snell/DOT did NOT effect your purchase decision, then you TRULY did waste $70.00 based on Snell/DOT requirements ONLY.
But if you come back and say that there were OTHER things you liked about the Scorpion (aside from Snell/DOT) that effected your purchase decision then you are int he same boat as we are.
We payed 2x more for Shoei/Arai becasue there were things we liked OTHER than the Snell/DOT rating. You did the SAME thing in your Scorpion purchase decision.
You have a perfectly good argument if you say that Scorpions are JUST as safe as Arai/Shoei because they passed the same Snell/DOT test. CORRECT, no argument here.
But you said that Arai/Shoei are not WORTH more money because they have the same Snell/DOT as Scorpions.
DO ... YOU ... FINALLY ... GET ... IT ... NOW? Apple to Apples, Oranges to Oranges, don't argue about Apples and use Oranges as your proof. It just makes you look silly, and you are not that silly. I know.